Next cliff move is the president’s

Published 12:26pm Thursday, December 20, 2012

As the impasse over the fiscal cliff enters week six, and time to work out a deal is quickly running short, unfortunately there is little sign of a breakthough. It really should not surprise anyone that the current impasse would deadlock an already divided government built around starkly different approaches to dealing with our nation’s looming budget disaster. Even more alarming, one side doesn’t seem to believe there is a problem.

Like the reality TV show, Intervention, the president and his followers in Congress are addicted to spending and will not budge unless forced to do so. It has been said that in order to overcome an addiction a person has to first reach rock bottom. What we are witnessing right now is a White House that chooses to ignore the cause of Washington’s $16 trillion debt and trillion dollar annual deficits – overspending. Is the president really willing to lead us all the way to rock bottom?    For more than a month, President Obama has taken the position that an $85 billion annual increase in job-killing taxes (enough to fund the government for about two weeks) and even more stimulus spending is all that’s needed to solve a looming budget crisis that threatens to undermine the solvency of the federal government and places Social Security and Medicare in mortal danger.  He is not just proposing kicking the can down the road; he wants to punt it out of the stadium and into the parking lot.

In contrast, Speaker Boehner has offered up a plan that generates an equal amount of new revenue through closing tax loopholes for higher income Americans – a plan supported by the president last year but rejected without a second thought now in order to score political points.

To be frank, for the president, the tax issue is a red herring.  The real reason the president refuses to deal is Speaker Boehner’s insistence that any agreement must also include spending cuts – a necessary step that is supported Erskine Bowles.  Our plan – the concept of which is based upon testimony delivered to Congress by Mr. Bowles during last summer’s budget negotiations – includes $900 billion in mandatory spending reductions and another $300 billion in discretionary spending cuts in addition to spending reductions enacted in 2011 Budget Control Act.

Speaker Boehner has offered a balanced plan of new revenues plus spending cuts. Reforming the onerous and unfair tax code is part of our plan as well as taking steps to save Social Security and Medicare from bankruptcy.  Similar reforms were embraced by President Obama’s own National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform in 2010 and summarily ignored by the White House.
Speaker Boehner has signaled the president that we are prepared to work through Christmas and New Year to hammer out a final agreement.  Mr. President, the next move is yours.

Editor's Picks